I have been speculating as to whether party affiliation is a thing of the 90's, and before, but no longer important. The Reeemainers (correct spelling) are a cross-party collective, who seem to care little for their own party. Hammond, for example, must realize that his position will see the Tories destroyed, and Farage installed as PM. Tom Watson must see that his bullying of Corbyn is actively harming Labour chances of forming Government. And yet neither men appear to care. Who is their master, we may ask.
This cross-party of pro-EU militants is ably aided and abetted by what I consider a longer-term cross-party grouping: women. The alliance of Hammond and Watson is likely temporary, but the hive-mind of female MP's appears to be permanent. They agree on so much, they would be as well joining forces to defeat patriarchy. Perhaps they already have, content to be relatively subtle as to 'the project'. That so many women in leadership positions hate Donald Trump is indicative of negative selection at its finest: the promotion of mediocre talents to positions above their ability, based on either corruption or adherence to globalist policies and values. Recall Emma Husar, babbling about 'Indigenous Rights' after the highly amusing ALP defeat in Australia? Oh Emma, only the Bubble People care about such rights. Don't be one of the Bubble People.
Or, perhaps, with increasing scrutiny, and 24/7 internet\media babble, we see what was hitherto hidden. Such opportunism was always routine, with strange alliances the perfect norm, and the debates mere circus entertainment. I do not at all rule this out.